However, in both cases the capacity of a forest to store carbon dioxide (CO2), a greenhouse gas, are compromised. ![]() The Amazon spans 2.1 million square miles across eight countries – Brazil, Bolivia, Peru, Ecuador, Colombia, Venezuela, Guyana and Suriname – but the majority, around 60 per cent, is within Brazil's borders.Īs a result, much of the battle against degradation and deforestation is the job of the Brazilian government.Īlthough the two are sometimes confused, degradation is different from deforestation, where the forest is removed altogether and a new land use, such as agriculture, is established in its place.Īlthough highly degraded forests can lose almost all of the trees, the land use itself does not change. 'Furthermore, many of these burdens are hidden at present recognising them will help enable better governance with social justice at the centre.' ![]() 'Few people profit from the degradation processes, yet many lose out across all dimensions of human well-being – including health, nutrition and the place attachments held for the forest landscapes where they live. 'Degradation benefits the few, but places important burdens on many,' said co-author Dr Rachel Carmenta at the University of East Anglia. It's been authored by a team of international researchers, from institutions including Lancaster University and University of East Anglia.įindings were based on satellite imagery and a review of published data outlining changes in the Amazon region between 20. The new study follows the appointment of a new Brazilian president, Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva, who has vowed to give the Amazon rainforest better protection.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |